You are not logged in.
No, any roles that actually are roles are possible.
Could be that everyone has a power role of some description.
zertap sure loves gay porn actors
abraker, can you use something other than tinypic? It keeps downscaling images and is generally a big poo.
Vote: Multtari
Voting no-lynch on the first day, remaining mostly inactive and then trying to steer the votes away from his mafia friend but then going back into voting for him as a effort not to seem suspicious.
something something something
Anyway, it probably only loads for me every time because I don't use cookies or something, so I suppose it's a non-issue for everyone else.
Cookies aren't related. If your browser uses cache, they only load once. The setting for this can be found in Settings>Advanced>Network (Firefox).
Of course if you're being a turbotinfoilhat and using private browsing the cached images get removed when closing the tab.
What up with the changing banners?
http://forum.tuuba.moe/viewtopic.php?id=82
Random banners for all.
Is this only for world news or can I post local news as well?
If it is interesting or somehow relevant.
http://yle.fi/uutiset/ngo_raps_finland_ … es/8407811
I wish these hippies would stop trying to gimp our last bastion of domestic defence industry.
Assuming it's not one of the situations where PNG offers comparable/better compression, and assuming the JPG isn't encoded with crappy quality settings, then JPG is fine.
I don't think the difference is gonna be that big, but I don't know your situation, and it wouldn't effect me at all. So whatever.
http://forum.tuuba.moe/img/banners/
jpeg at photoshop quality 12 (png is lossless so this is most comparable quality wise)
saituuba2000.png 160KB, jpeg 126KB = jpeg is 34KB smaller
aesthetics.png 14KB, jpg 64KB = jpeg is 50KB bigger
anime.png 436KB, jpeg 93KB = jpeg is 343KB smaller
banner1.png 35KB, jpeg 51KB = jpeg is 16KB bigger
contrabanner.png 169KB, jpeg 157KB = jpeg is 12KB smaller
dsbanner.png 32KB, jpeg 69KB = jpeg is 37KB bigger
neverasked.png 244KB, jpeg 144KB = jpeg is 100KB smaller
ninjagaidenbanner.png 234KB, jpeg 278KB = jpeg is 44KB bigger
olutbanner.png 822KB, jpeg 161KB = jpeg is 661KB smaller
sauce.png 165KB, jpeg 85KB = jpeg is 80KB smaller
shit.png 361KB, jpeg 255KB = jpeg is 136KB smaller
silence.png 0.2KB, jpeg 44KB = jpeg is 43.8KB bigger
tuubabanner.png is not applicable as it's APNG.
Grand total bandwidth savings of 1175KB when using jpeg of similar percieved quality.
And this is before optimizing the png files (zertap get on it)
Oh and you only download the images once anyway, since they're saved in browser cache.
The largest banner will take about 15 seconds to load on a 56k dialup.
Do we have anyone with a 56k dialup?
Banners are a go, please report any oddities in the banner submission thread.
the points I never asked for
To be honest if enough people agree it would be more convenient to just remove them altogether.