If there were ever a case of someone 'blocking their ears to a dissenting opinion', it's here. I may have 'radical' opinions on things like gender and race, but it's not like I have a predisposition to believing these things. I just don't look at the world through ideological goggles. I'm still willing to listen and be convinced by what you or anyone else has to say. You even had somewhat valid concerns about Trump with Russia and everything.

Which state are you in?

loving watching these American ads tho

Just because in your view anyone who's not a career politician who constantly spouts PC bullshit and lies isn't 'presidential', doesn't mean we will have a problem negotiating. I'm sure lots of world leaders will hate him, because he isn't part of their international cabal of corruption.
And bringing up that video again? Why do you demonise some stupid video yet ignore everything I've stated about all much more morally detestable things Hillary has done in private?

She knows how to politics, as in she's a massive insider with a proven track record of corruption and promoting the interest of her elite donors. She is no different than Obama, Bush, etc., America needs change, not more of the same.

Trump has plenty of policies, some I've already stated. It's not like he can just click his fingers and fix everything, but actually acknowledging the problem is the first step in fixing anything, and you know for a certainty that Hillary won't even try. And I've already said why it's evident that Trump is the anti-establishment candidate. He already has lots of money and power, he has spent millions out of his own pocket to fund his campaign. He has no good incentive to run, besides the actual desire to make the country better. What other motive would he have? To use his presidency to benefit his businesses? Is he just a megalomaniac who wants power? Also evidence points towards him being the anti-establishment candidate, any claim otherwise is unfounded speculation.
Funny how you state the fallacy of 'making the rich richer' when I wrote a whole block of text debunking the socialist theories. Women voting is one of the things that causes the decline in civilisation. Women don't pay any net taxes yet are very keen on spending other people's money.

But those statements are laughable claims. And no, states are not philanthropic entities, their duty is to their own citizens, not randoms from third world countries.

There's blacks, latino's and other minorities, most women and beta males voting against Trump. There's also voter fraud and voting machine rigging to contend with. I wonder if there's enough patriots left in the country.  If Hillary wins she will let so many immigrants in I wonder if the right will ever be able to take power again.

MAGA

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1-BXjtnVmVs

Socialism isn't sustainable at all. You're taking money from the wealth successful people and giving it to the dumb and lazy, which hampers economic growth and doesn't even reduce wealth disparity. In fact socialism promotes poverty, the poverty in America was in decline until welfare was introduced. Because you get generations dependent on welfare, and then those people breed and increase and create even more people dependent on welfare.
And then on to of that you immigrants pouring in trying to take advantage of the gibs me dats. Welfare state + lax immigration control = disaster.
High taxes and regulation, these things are the anathema to business. Even if you have this view that businesses are evil, increasing taxes will not make them pay their fair share. They will simply avoid the taxes, move to another country etc. higher taxes is not associated with higher tax revenue in the long run.

The private sector is simply more efficient. With the things the government do, you could throw your money into a wishing well and it would probably benefit society more than giving it to the government. Pouring money into healthcare, education, social programs etc. does not improve society. And infrastructure is good, but now the majority of the voter base doesn't care about infrastructure or the economy, the just want free stuff.

Trump is not worse, no way in hell. He is not running for the corrupt establishment interests, that's Hillary. Hillary is the incarnation of establishment corruption, of criminality, and frankly evil in general. Trump used to be part of the elite, as he was saying in one of his rallies yesterday, but as an insider and a businessmen he knows how the elite play the system. He wants to lower taxes but decrease tax avoidance and increase economic growth and create jobs. Trump is the populist candidate running for the people, if that wasn't the case as I've said then the establishment wouldn't hate him so much.

“The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.”

― Margaret Thatcher

If you draw more Tuuba-chans you can send them straight to my inbox.