You are not logged in.
well can you really tell if whoever had them before had them running overclocked and undercooled for 2-3 years straight? that kind of wear isn't going to be apparent until the card dies soon after getting it
sure it can work out and you can get real lucky but i feel like it's not a risk worth taking most of the time, and the r9 380 is still better than the 770 and cheaper new.
I don't know though, maybe in finland these prices are wildly different, but in the states AMD cards are priced competitively with nvidia. If it's really cheaper to get a 770 than either of the other 2 then I would go for it because the 770 is still really good, benchmarks exactly evenly with 660 SLI on 3dmark, and real-world performance is vastly superior when you consider it's not carrying the baggage of SLI's limited support in games.
Or get a used 770 which is faster than a 960.
used graphics cards are very sketchy for obvious reasons namely how abused they likely were, even though the age of bitcoin mining is basically over I would never risk it.
I'd just get a new one
now all the #tuuba autists come and flood this thread with their computer banter what have you done
edit: for some on-topic discussion i have a geforce gtx 660 and want a better one someone want to fund me?
Essentially I'd get the r9 380 4gb if you game at higher resolutions or have multiple monitors and the gtx 960 2gb if you're using a single 1080p monitor. Ignore memory bus size, it doesn't really matter.
Both are good value and are at around the same price point your 660 was at its release date.
general discussion about hardware, what they're used for, comparisons, shilling for your favorite brands, questions, how they're made, anything really.
anyone interested in showing off how bad/good their shit is can use this and link the page it opens up after completing.
looks like x86 is here to stay for quite a while longer boys
http://www.digitaltrends.com/computing/ … -ces-2015/
we should have a shoutbox
fits the theme/feel of this place
denying the points from someone
hopefully it works that way anyway
this thread dont even have as many views as old ITT has posts yet
1
point
1 point
The Alexander L. Kielland was a Norwegian semi-submersible drilling rig that capsized whilst working in the Ekofisk oil field in March 1980 killing 123 people. The capsizing was the worst disaster in Norwegian waters since World War II. The rig, located approximately 320 km east from Dundee, Scotland, was owned by the Stavanger Drilling Company of Norway and was on hire to the U.S. company Phillips Petroleum at the time of the disaster. In driving rain and mist, early in the evening of 27 March 1980 more than 200 men were off duty in the accommodation on the Alexander L. Kielland. The wind was gusting to 40 knots with waves up to 12 m high. The rig had just been winched away from the Edda production platform. Minutes before 18:30 those on board felt a 'sharp crack' followed by 'some kind of trembling'. Suddenly the rig heeled over 30° and then stabilised. Five of the six anchor cables had broken, with one remaining cable preventing the rig from capsizing. The list continued to increase and at 18.53 the remaining anchor cable snapped and the rig turned upside down.
A year later in March 1981, the investigative report[25] concluded that the rig collapsed owing to a fatigue crack in one of its six bracings (bracing D-6), which connected the collapsed D-leg to the rest of the rig. This was traced to a small 6 mm fillet weld which joined a non-load-bearing flange plate to this D-6 bracing. This flange plate held a sonar device used during drilling operations. The poor profile of the fillet weld contributed to a reduction in its fatigue strength. Further, the investigation found considerable amounts of lamellar tearing in the flange plate and cold cracks in the butt weld. Cold cracks in the welds, increased stress concentrations due to the weakened flange plate, the poor weld profile, and cyclical stresses (which would be common in the North Sea), seemed to collectively play a role in the rig's collapse.
1 point
may 23
yeah this cloud sync mega downloader "IMPORT EVERYTHING TO YOUR CLOUD DRIVE THEN SYNC IT XDDD" shit is really bad, im gonna picking the gunk out of my services and registry for awhile after trying that crap. I don't know why you were able to download it from browser and I couldn't, it refused to download it to my hard drive and instead maxed out my RAM and gave me out of memory errors. [i also have 8g]
eh ill pass, cant find a non sketchy download for 'mega downloader' and it seems for sure like its going to install a lot of bloat shit
thanks for the effort though.
out of memory at 9%, apparently i can't download this because i dont have 32gb of ram
was worth a shot
guess downloading to my hard drive is too hard for mega.co.nz