You are not logged in.
Appearantly the forum software atm has it so you have to edit some of the files itself, so it's not currently tied to the regular title system and how it works.
You need to spend enough good boy-points to get that. How much you got?
Just proving my point even further
Has some serious lack in contextual reading
Even though the most visible reason for my vote is quite shallow, I still have a feeling (unless proven wrong) that Shiringo is among the most uncontributing posters (along with LunarStorms near zero input) and should be among the ones to go. I'm not changing my vote until there's more to come
Puzzling at times
Has a squeezable butt
Like we could agree upon that either.
It's way easier if we're all crazy in the end anyways.
But well, day one isn't really going anywhere and I'd really like Shiringo to explain himself to me. The amount of input is kill.
Overall people are just all over the place and getting tangled up with their prejudices for people.
BUT if we wanna get rid of this situation of d1 chaos, we should probably just bandwagon someone down and see what day 2 has to offer?
Yeah, that's just bad. Unless you have any kind of reasoning against me, that smells absolutely scummy
Vote:Shiringo
I told her in IRC to get around and read the thread.
As slippy as enets defences has been, I'm not inclined to start bandwagoning against him. Especially how it seems he'll gather votes quite fast at this rate.
We need more people to voice out on how they see the current situation, more perspective upon things is needed right now
According to her, she's been busy. So I'd wait on that regard to see when she finally manages to reach the forum side
Considering we have 48 hour deadlines for inactivity, 24 hours is where the quiet ones will get suspicious in my eyes.
I might be quilty of this at times too, since irl and I'm not a mobile poster unless Mara forces me to probe his anus
So, basically, instead of voting for those who are being quite, as it usually happens (at least, in my experience), we're voting for those who are drawing a lot of attention to themselves? I mean, I totally agree that I got carried away, as I said before, but people like me are just what the mafia's waiting and praying for, we keep most of the attention on ourselves and getting votes while mafia is just sliently looking at this whole show and waiting for such guys to get as many votes as possible and then securing their lynching by voting themselves.
Gotta take the advantage of having active people. Get their defences out and check what they might be up to.
Can't really vote for people who hasn't even visited the forum once the game started, that if something would be a good opportunity for a precise mafia strike if anything (considering how bandwagons might get out of hand)
I don't think it's fair to call them silent or inactive considering the game only started a few hours ago.
I still don't see how that's him pointing fingers at himself, and I'm still suspicious of you. I'm not willing to call for your lynch until I hear input from other law-abiding citizens though. Voting isn't the problem - it's who you voted for and why.
From my interpretion, the RP he started was on the wrong tracks and that caused me to think he's a bit suspicious too at first. But hey, no one is born to take on roles.
I myself wouldn't still go for the vote, just for the fear of a jester. Chaos can be controlled, but letting someone have a free win based on just clearing out the garbage is a bit dumb.