Tuuba Mafia [MAFIA & LYNCHER WIN]

ksg · ^

In fact, he's been inactive for more than 48 hours, which should be grounds for mod prodding, if I remember correctly.

I might have made a tiny little miscalculation. Nevermind this one.

Brian OA · ^

He's probably just busy

ksg · ^

Busy playing FO4

zertap · ^

IppE wrote:

This beating around the bush isn't progressing anything though.
Vote: zertap

You never unvoted in the first place (unless I'm blind).

Anyways, yeah, been busy with games.
I'll go through the recent posts more carefully after I get back home from school.
I might not post anything though. Been awake whole night, and I probably can't think straight after classes.

Mara · ^

Votes

Brian OA (2) - Multtari, abraker
zertap (1) - IppE
ksg (1) - zertap

No Vote (2) - Brian OA, ksg

Multtari · ^

Soo Zertap is under pressure now

*Throws invisible vote to prevent mafia from getting opportunity to get townie lynched :^)*

Considering Brian already has two votes means that:

There is only one mafioso left
Mafia is unable to perform instalynch
Mafia doesn't want to be bold, but that doesn't make sense since bodyguard is dead, it's highly likely that it will be two townies vs two mafioso after the night. It will be quickly tied and townies have to vote for same person without any means to communicate (except if decided before night starts)

Am i wrong?

ksg also gave 5th vote to astrobird during Day 1 (somehow missed that) which makes me 75% sure he is pro-town.

IppE > ksg > zertap > abraker > Brian

Multtari · ^

Oh yeah. If Brian OA isn't mafioso, you guys are too late now.

Unvote Brian OA

abraker · ^

Multtari wrote:

It will be quickly tied and townies have to vote for same person without any means to communicate (except if decided before night starts)

Wait... won't that mean that mafia win?

2) Any other faction wins when they control half the votes during Day unless otherwise specified in the Role PM.

abraker · ^

Multtari wrote:

Am i wrong?

Explain the following logic:
Brian already has two votes -> There is only one mafioso left

Multtari · ^

Mara wrote:

7) If no one has been lynched, and the deadline has passed, the person with the most votes gets lynched. If there is a tie, the one who reached the tying amount of votes first, is lynched.

Forgot about that rule and assumed it goes this way. My mistake.

abraker · ^

Since picking the wrong person as mafia will end as a tie the next game, and I still suspect Brian of 3rd party, I'll have to unvote him

Unvote: Brian OA

Multtari · ^

Brian had two votes and mafia didn't get him lynched AKA

Only one mafioso left, no reason to join bandwagons at this point of the game and endanger current status.
Brian is mafioso + partner waiting for townie to get two votes and instalynch the townie
IppE is mafioso + partner waiting for Brian to get 3 votes (which is highly doubt)
Neither of them is mafioso, mafia hesitated to react.

abraker · ^

Multtari wrote:

Only one mafioso left, no reason to join bandwagons at this point of the game and endanger current status.

But EVERYONE voted for Brian at some point in this day. This argument is therefore invalid.

Multtari wrote:

Brian is mafioso + partner waiting for townie to get two votes and instalynch the townie

That's not a bad strategy if it is true. However, I can't imagine what the other mafioso's reaction was to Brian's fooling around. Raising suspension to himself as mafia is a dodgy tactic, and even more so since he is playing as a noob. If he is mafia, then we just ignored a bright flashing sign pointing to the mafioso.

Multtari wrote:

IppE is mafioso + partner waiting for Brian to get 3 votes (which is highly doubt)

IppE had zertap voted while Brian was a vote away from being instalynched at one point. This argument is invalid.

Multtari wrote:

Neither of them is mafioso, mafia hesitated to react.

Which looks like another possibility. Nobody wants to be that last guy to instalynch someone. BUT, were mafia to kill brian off, they'd get rid of a towny during the night and end it with a tie and winning, so hesitation here is irrelevant unless they are stupid. Therefore this argument is likely invalid.

Multtari wrote:

Brian is mafioso + partner waiting for townie to get two votes and instalynch the townie

This sounds most promising.

ksg · ^

Still waiting for zertap to actually say something.

Multtari · ^

Multtari wrote:

IppE is mafioso + partner waiting for Brian to get 3 votes (which is highly doubt)

abraker wrote:

IppE had zertap voted while Brian was a vote away from being instalynched at one point. This argument is invalid.

Can't see it atleast during this day. Specify.
It might not have been relevant thing during earlier days, hell i didn't even notice that someone would get lynched if they had half of the votes.

Multtari wrote:

Neither of them is mafioso, mafia hesitated to react didn't act.

^ #361 2015-11-11 00:18:27

Re: Tuuba Mafia [MAFIA & LYNCHER WIN]

^ #362 2015-11-11 01:37:46

Re: Tuuba Mafia [MAFIA & LYNCHER WIN]

^ #363 2015-11-11 04:44:22

Re: Tuuba Mafia [MAFIA & LYNCHER WIN]

^ #364 2015-11-11 07:20:01

Re: Tuuba Mafia [MAFIA & LYNCHER WIN]

^ #365 2015-11-11 07:25:29

Re: Tuuba Mafia [MAFIA & LYNCHER WIN]

Votes

^ #366 2015-11-12 03:08:20

Re: Tuuba Mafia [MAFIA & LYNCHER WIN]

^ #367 2015-11-12 03:17:21

Re: Tuuba Mafia [MAFIA & LYNCHER WIN]

^ #368 2015-11-12 04:04:16

Re: Tuuba Mafia [MAFIA & LYNCHER WIN]

^ #369 2015-11-12 04:12:16

Re: Tuuba Mafia [MAFIA & LYNCHER WIN]

^ #370 2015-11-12 04:14:39

Re: Tuuba Mafia [MAFIA & LYNCHER WIN]

^ #371 2015-11-12 04:17:49

Re: Tuuba Mafia [MAFIA & LYNCHER WIN]

^ #372 2015-11-12 04:26:22

Re: Tuuba Mafia [MAFIA & LYNCHER WIN]

^ #373 2015-11-12 04:59:38

Re: Tuuba Mafia [MAFIA & LYNCHER WIN]

^ #374 2015-11-12 05:14:30

Re: Tuuba Mafia [MAFIA & LYNCHER WIN]

^ #375 2015-11-12 08:32:38

Re: Tuuba Mafia [MAFIA & LYNCHER WIN]

Board footer