ITT: Pretend we are still writing in osu! OT

Pirtelö · ^

if u upsetti have some spaghetti

Mara · ^

Did I miss something? Did someone post CP or some shit? I mean, I thought it was obvious that CP is a big no when it comes to rules.

Pirtelö · ^

I don't think so, b1rd wrote he discussed it with IppE or something. I don't even know anymore :D

ksg · ^

IppE and B1rd simply had a discussion about it, decided posting children in the lewd forum is not fine, and Aurani felt like moralizing about the rule for some reason.
Maybe we could just agree that in the end IppE is a moderator/operator of the forum, and therefore he decides what's right or wrong on the forum. If you don't agree with a rule, you can contact him directly instead of arguing about it with other people who have no power, as that'll lead to precisely fuckall.

Last edited by ksg (2015-11-21 11:12:15)

Mara · ^

I'm just saying that it's already in the damn rules. It's kind of like osu!staff gathering now and saying "Alright chaps, we have decided to silence everyone who posts that fucking suwako image".

B1rd · ^

I didn't agree to anything, but like you say, it's his forum. Nothing wrong with having a good discussion though, I've never understood why some people are so adverse to having a heated debate or argument about something.

Aurelianus Augustus · ^

The only thing I was trying to say is that it's beyond absurd that people post sickening shit in the Lewd subforum and then you "discuss" if child porn is a no-no.

I mean, half the shit going on in that place is already at the same level as child porn - that's the entire point I tried to make.

B1rd · ^

We were never talking about child porn, like Mara said, that's obviously not allowed. We was talking about pictures of children, whether they're fully clothed or not.

Pirtelö · ^

I personally think that's sick. but as you said it's all about what IppE decides. I don't think anyone here would post such a thing anyway.

B1rd · ^

IppE is literally Hitler. Common guys, time to migrate to a new forum now :^)

ksg · ^

Honestly I don't think any kind of drawn pornography can ever, in any way be "at the same level" as actual real child porn. It's a very subjective matter.
Also, the rule they discussed about was apparently about posting any images children on the lewd sub-forum, pornographic or not. Child porn was out of the question all the time, thankfully, and wasn't the point of their discussion in the first place, as far as I understand.

Edit: I'm too slow

Last edited by ksg (2015-11-21 11:28:33)

Pirtelö · ^

I think a picture of a naked child (or even half naked) is just as sick as child pornography, when in that context.

Mara · ^

Right.
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/223 … 61512.webm

I need to clean my dropbox folder, too much shit in Public

Last edited by Mara (2015-11-21 11:30:46)

ksg · ^

Pirtelö wrote:

I think a picture of a naked child (or even half naked) is just as sick as child pornography, when in that context.

I don't think that was the point either. Like, any picture of a child. Throw nakedness completely out the window. Just a picture of a child.

And I think it's still a fair rule. It's a subforum for lewd things. If you view a child, clothed or not, as something lewd you're fucking sick in the head in my books, and posting a child's picture there would imply that you do. It would also definitely just feel "wrong" idk how to explain it. I guess you get it unless you're a complete degenerate.

Last edited by ksg (2015-11-21 11:37:25)

B1rd · ^

I don't see the problem with it. View children in a sexual manner all you want as far as I care, as long as you're not molesting real children then it's fine. And when you ban stuff like loli, and I assume this would also apply to photos of real kids as well, the rate of crimes against children increases. This has been documented in a few countries, notably Japan. I don't see how you can morally justify it when it actually increases the amount of children being harmed.

^ #2476 2015-11-21 11:04:20

Re: ITT: Pretend we are still writing in osu! OT

^ #2477 2015-11-21 11:04:57

Re: ITT: Pretend we are still writing in osu! OT

^ #2478 2015-11-21 11:06:44

Re: ITT: Pretend we are still writing in osu! OT

^ #2479 2015-11-21 11:11:59

Re: ITT: Pretend we are still writing in osu! OT

^ #2480 2015-11-21 11:16:01

Re: ITT: Pretend we are still writing in osu! OT

^ #2481 2015-11-21 11:16:58

Re: ITT: Pretend we are still writing in osu! OT

^ #2482 2015-11-21 11:18:35

Re: ITT: Pretend we are still writing in osu! OT

^ #2483 2015-11-21 11:21:53

Re: ITT: Pretend we are still writing in osu! OT

^ #2484 2015-11-21 11:23:15

Re: ITT: Pretend we are still writing in osu! OT

^ #2485 2015-11-21 11:24:37

Re: ITT: Pretend we are still writing in osu! OT

^ #2486 2015-11-21 11:25:42

Re: ITT: Pretend we are still writing in osu! OT

^ #2487 2015-11-21 11:29:00

Re: ITT: Pretend we are still writing in osu! OT

^ #2488 2015-11-21 11:29:33

Re: ITT: Pretend we are still writing in osu! OT

^ #2489 2015-11-21 11:35:11

Re: ITT: Pretend we are still writing in osu! OT

^ #2490 2015-11-21 11:43:44

Re: ITT: Pretend we are still writing in osu! OT

Board footer