ITT: Pretend we are still writing in osu! OT

enet · ^

In a constant state of being high, I'm sure you'd have no trouble thinking up of some wacky ass password that not even the best hacker in the world could crack.

Hades Izanami · ^

pfft, that's NEDM, he's constantly high, I'm just me, thanks for asking.

speaking of him, I haven't seen them in a while, like others. Maybe he transcended Nirvana.

Last edited by Hades Izanami (2016-07-31 22:52:06)

tupsu · ^

Nelias2096 wrote:

Tbh if people just use the pseudo-random passwords it would be nearly as safe as your method as long as they have other parts covered like anti-malware and not getting social engineered. Because if either of those happen it pretty much doesn't matter what your passwords are, how they are created or where are they stored. In this case the problem would be solved by just increasing complexity be it by your method or just using a pseudo-random number. I mean if they were able to decode the time you created your password (the exact nanoseconds etc.) and the pseudo-random number generator algorithm why couldn't they just as easily get into tuuba's database and reverse-engineer the encryption algorithm to get all the passwords?

no but who the actual DICK are you

I'm back from my music festival and I feel like I've been heavily drinking when reality I only had half a sip of my mum's shitty cocktail yesterday and instantly complained it's too bitter

Mara · ^

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mHSShWr4D2A

What carrying in CS:GO feels like*

Nelias2096 · ^

I'm just a Finnish person who likes bemani :^)

enet · ^

It's always some random Finnish dude. Never get anyone new from a worthwhile country. :(

Aurelianus Augustus · ^

It's just IppE and Mara collecting fuckbuddies from games/chats. :p

I don't really care where someone is coming from as long as they're intriguing enough to talk to. Gladi surprised me very much recently, so I hope more actually interesting people come here.

IppE · ^

Aurelianus Augustus wrote:

It's just IppE and Mara collecting fuckbuddies from games/chats. :p

I rarely even play games with random people.

IppE · ^

GladiOol wrote:

stop teasing us and post the list already you faggot
oh and ps, crack my pass and you get my osu account for free!

▼Hidden text

Hades Izanami · ^

Phew, at least I'm not in the minority, thx Dude.

Granger · ^

Now to see how many accounts im able to hijack based on that information. comp10

jk

fittan · ^

Keepass2 shilling below

▼Hidden text

Aurelianus Augustus wrote:

Tbh any password can easily be raped, was my point. Still no excuse to have a shitty one on your most important things.

no

Granger wrote:

Yeah, except most "random" password generators arent random at all. Most use the current time (in nanoseconds), cpu cycles or something as seed and sell that as "random". All you need is to figure out what algorythm these use and boom passwords = royally rekt.
Master password stuff also has the risk of... well if that one is cracked, EVERYTHING is gone. No... just no.

ya ok

Aurelianus Augustus wrote:

What people don't realise at all is that a strong password isn't one that's ofqhwbiot129125y1923htoqfjkmweogh3t18i932tq3hti9q3kFhQAWIWEGHBQ#8ti123th9123thnFFIKqHBNFIQwet1q23yht91234r5124hfgnEI"f but a password that's regularly changed. Little will your shitty 92 digit password do if you use it for 7 years.

also wrong you can use the same password for the entirety of the foreseeable future as long as you do not use it elsewhere

Granger wrote:

A regulary changed password is not any more secure as one that is not... all it does is boot off people that already got it and kills crackers current progress of figuring your password out (assuming they dont simply use random order, which is fairly archiac but lucky motherfuckers exit).
Which is fairly moot if your password is so long it'd take a billon years or so to crack using a cluster of cutting edge tech. Which, frankly, no one of us ever will be attacked with, we're not that important.
What matters is: Symbol variety (letters, numbers, symbols altcodes... etc, the more you have available, the possibilities rise expotentially) and lenght (ditto, the longer, the more possibilities, expotentially) and those expotentially multiply each other.

dance like nobody is watching and encrypt like everyone is. this also applies to passwords.

Granger wrote:

You'd be fucked if you'd rely on this. Its just another attack point you're giving there, which you should avoid.
The more dependencies you have, the more likely it is that something breaks and you're fuk'd. Basically, you want the attacker to know as little as possible (somewhat related: social engineering is actually the more successful method of fishing passwords, over Bruteforcing. Not sure how succesful keyloggers are in relation to these two.) (also this is why sites forcing you to have your password between 6-10 symbols, with numbers and capitalized letters and all too often without alt codes... is stupid*.) and as few attack points as possible.
*Theres some merit for the layman: You can have a cascaded attack where the attacker first uses only letter, then only numbers and and so on, but in general, you're decreasing the amount of valid passwords and thus the time needed to crack them. If theres no such limit on the password the attacker needs to run the number only (etc...) runs first, but if its there, he can skip those passwords altogether! So for the sake for those who dont use number only (or variations), it would be better if these limitations WERENT there.

you would need to rob me in person to have access to my encrypted randomly generated passwords unless you RAT me and download them from my thumb drive, and even then..

edit: albeit if you RAT me you would also keylog me decrypting it, granted you are able to RAT me

edit2: would it be harder to steal if i were to pull out my thumb drive after i'm finished decrypting it? since i don't shut down my computer very often i very seldom have to decrypt it

Last edited by fittan (2016-08-01 04:25:30)

Pirtelö · ^

calm down fags bye

Aurelianus Augustus · ^

Idk why you mentioned me on that list considering I told you that I don't find the security of my Tuuba account important at all, as it has a unique password that's easy to remember in case it autologs me off like it sometimes does. I actually share that password on all of my forums and forums only.
Regardless, yes, it's the name of a very good friend from highschool and her birth year. :p

The pass of my main email where I have my bank account linked as well as PayPal and other important shit is 58 characters long and if the shitty password security site is anything to go by, it probably wouldn't take the machine 7 untrigintillion years to crack it (as the site lists), but would make for a nice and hard boiled egg to crack.

Last edited by Aurelianus Augustus (2016-08-01 05:38:02)

Koma · ^

IppE wrote:

GladiOol wrote:
stop teasing us and post the list already you faggot
oh and ps, crack my pass and you get my osu account for free!
▼Hidden text
GladiOol --> check your osu! pm inbox

[toxx intensifies]

^ #11491 2016-07-31 22:20:22

Re: ITT: Pretend we are still writing in osu! OT

^ #11492 2016-07-31 22:51:52

Re: ITT: Pretend we are still writing in osu! OT

^ #11493 2016-07-31 23:22:09

Re: ITT: Pretend we are still writing in osu! OT

^ #11494 2016-07-31 23:24:54

Re: ITT: Pretend we are still writing in osu! OT

^ #11495 2016-07-31 23:31:18

Re: ITT: Pretend we are still writing in osu! OT

^ #11496 2016-08-01 00:02:58

Re: ITT: Pretend we are still writing in osu! OT

^ #11497 2016-08-01 00:19:30

Re: ITT: Pretend we are still writing in osu! OT

^ #11498 2016-08-01 01:42:18

Re: ITT: Pretend we are still writing in osu! OT

^ #11499 2016-08-01 03:16:54

Re: ITT: Pretend we are still writing in osu! OT

^ #11500 2016-08-01 03:36:50

Re: ITT: Pretend we are still writing in osu! OT

^ #11501 2016-08-01 03:42:59

Re: ITT: Pretend we are still writing in osu! OT

^ #11502 2016-08-01 04:21:45

Re: ITT: Pretend we are still writing in osu! OT

^ #11503 2016-08-01 04:25:03

Re: ITT: Pretend we are still writing in osu! OT

^ #11504 2016-08-01 05:20:56

Re: ITT: Pretend we are still writing in osu! OT

^ #11505 2016-08-01 06:32:46

Re: ITT: Pretend we are still writing in osu! OT

Board footer