ITT: Pretend we are still writing in osu! OT

Hika · ^

Sync wrote:

Should pedos be castrated?
Not like there's much to castrate though

maybe not daddy

silmarilen · ^

Sync wrote:

Should pedos be castrated?
Not like there's much to castrate though

Child molesters shouldn't be allowed to walk around freely.

tekihtimaliolan · ^

silmarilen wrote:

Sync wrote:
Should pedos be castrated?
Not like there's much to castrate though
Child molesters shouldn't be allowed to walk around freely.

pedophiles ≠ child molesters

Mahogany · ^

Can we instead have better mental health services so that potential pedophiles/child molesters/whatever can get treatment for themselves and learn to control themselves so they don't ruin their victims lives' or their own?

EliAslit · ^

If you are attracted to children then you probably don't have that much self-control anyway, but the problem is that the moment when people usually find out someone is a pedophile is when they molest somebody, because most people wouldn't go tell that they are a pedophile.

silmarilen · ^

tekihtimaliolan wrote:

silmarilen wrote:
Sync wrote:
Should pedos be castrated?
Not like there's much to castrate though
Child molesters shouldn't be allowed to walk around freely.
pedophiles ≠ child molesters

That's why i said child molester and not pedophile.

fittan · ^

Granger wrote:

Yes. Some act retarded, some are retarded. Lil but fine difference, but in the end its still shit.

it's an abstract kind of joke

Hades Izanami · ^

tekihtimaliolan wrote:

pedophiles ≠ child molesters

they have something in common, so there isnt much difference, tikitotem

Last edited by Hades Izanami (2016-10-05 18:52:58)

Brian OA · ^

Hades Izanami wrote:

tekihtimaliolan wrote:
pedophiles ≠ child molesters
they have something in common, so there isnt much difference, tikitotem

Not quite, battler. You see, when two or more things have something in common, it doesn't mean that there is little difference between them. That is to say, just because you could compare two things and got one thing under that list, doesn't mean there's not much contrast between them. For example, we can observe that IppE and Mara are both Finnish. Despite that one similarity, that speaks nothing of their insurmountable differences in background, taste, and personality.

To look at the point in case, pedophiles and child molesters do share one thing in common with their particular disposition toward minors. In fact, one person could be both of these things at the same time. However, they are still two different things, one being dominated by your background and the other by your sexual deviations. You can't be a child molester unless you have molested a child, and you can't be a pedophile unless you are attracted to minors.

Now, you could argue that we should still punish pedophiles on grounds that they're the only demographic that could become child molesters, but at that point you would be judging people based on what they might do rather than on what they have done. That's no good.

Was that clear?

tupsu · ^

Hades Izanami wrote:

tekihtimaliolan wrote:
pedophiles ≠ child molesters
they have something in common, so there isnt much difference, tikitotem

we have something in common, we're both humans - your point?
for one, I'm not as lacking in mental capacities as you are

Hades Izanami · ^

Brian OA wrote:

Not quite, battler. You see, when two or more things have something in common, it doesn't mean that there is little difference between them. That is to say, just because you could compare two things and got one thing under that list, doesn't mean there's not much contrast between them. For example, we can observe that IppE and Mara are both Finnish. Despite that one similarity, that speaks nothing of their insurmountable differences in background, taste, and personality.
To look at the point in case, pedophiles and child molesters do share one thing in common with their particular disposition toward minors. In fact, one person could be both of these things at the same time. However, they are still two different things, one being dominated by your background and the other by your sexual deviations. You can't be a child molester unless you have molested a child, and you can't be a pedophile unless you are attracted to minors.
Now, you could argue that we should still punish pedophiles on grounds that they're the only demographic that could become child molesters, but at that point you would be judging people based on what they might do rather than on what they have done. That's no good.
Was that clear?

Clear as water, you're very good giving explanations, I wonder why haven't you got laid yet.

tupsu wrote:

pfft

I'm sorry, did you said something? I couldn't hear it with all that static.

enet · ^

Hades Izanami wrote:

Brian OA wrote:
Not quite, battler. You see, when two or more things have something in common, it doesn't mean that there is little difference between them. That is to say, just because you could compare two things and got one thing under that list, doesn't mean there's not much contrast between them. For example, we can observe that IppE and Mara are both Finnish. Despite that one similarity, that speaks nothing of their insurmountable differences in background, taste, and personality.
To look at the point in case, pedophiles and child molesters do share one thing in common with their particular disposition toward minors. In fact, one person could be both of these things at the same time. However, they are still two different things, one being dominated by your background and the other by your sexual deviations. You can't be a child molester unless you have molested a child, and you can't be a pedophile unless you are attracted to minors.
Now, you could argue that we should still punish pedophiles on grounds that they're the only demographic that could become child molesters, but at that point you would be judging people based on what they might do rather than on what they have done. That's no good.
Was that clear?
Clear as water, you're very good giving explanations, I wonder why haven't you got laid yet.

lol, this genuinely made me laugh. How does giving good explanations correlate with getting laid? xd .-.

Brian OA · ^

Because IppE keeps shooting me down

;______________________________;

Hades Izanami · ^

Its not all about beauty, enet. Or the beauty you pretend you have. Chicks also dig smart guys, ya know what I'm saying?

Granger · ^

its more the charismatic guys before anything else tbhq.

^ #14356 2016-10-05 14:35:32

Re: ITT: Pretend we are still writing in osu! OT

^ #14357 2016-10-05 17:04:51

Re: ITT: Pretend we are still writing in osu! OT

^ #14358 2016-10-05 17:12:43

Re: ITT: Pretend we are still writing in osu! OT

^ #14359 2016-10-05 17:26:58

Re: ITT: Pretend we are still writing in osu! OT

^ #14360 2016-10-05 17:39:45

Re: ITT: Pretend we are still writing in osu! OT

^ #14361 2016-10-05 18:03:24

Re: ITT: Pretend we are still writing in osu! OT

^ #14362 2016-10-05 18:12:23

Re: ITT: Pretend we are still writing in osu! OT

^ #14363 2016-10-05 18:52:43

Re: ITT: Pretend we are still writing in osu! OT

^ #14364 2016-10-05 19:23:24

Re: ITT: Pretend we are still writing in osu! OT

^ #14365 2016-10-05 19:23:33

Re: ITT: Pretend we are still writing in osu! OT

^ #14366 2016-10-05 21:00:13

Re: ITT: Pretend we are still writing in osu! OT

^ #14367 2016-10-05 21:19:12

Re: ITT: Pretend we are still writing in osu! OT

^ #14368 2016-10-05 22:52:18

Re: ITT: Pretend we are still writing in osu! OT

^ #14369 2016-10-05 23:35:26

Re: ITT: Pretend we are still writing in osu! OT

^ #14370 2016-10-05 23:41:02

Re: ITT: Pretend we are still writing in osu! OT

Board footer