You are not logged in.
I forget how few we are and how few are needed for majority. Also,
I wouldnt jump into quick conclusions but Aurelianus fast response is pretty suspicious, given the fact that the first vote was random. Now I wouldnt call IppE the nicest guy in the world, so lets keep an eye on him too.
don't associate with me so easily, I have no clue who you are.
I managed to stir the pot sufficiently enough, though.
Unvote: Auralianus Augustus.
あああああああ
Offline
Apologies for neglecting...
As there is very little to go by currently, I'll vote based on Hades Izanami's less than convincing logic. Maybe they're trying to stir up arguments for their own benefit? Who knows.
Vote: Hades Izanami
Offline
abraker, remember that no-lynch is also a vote which can end the day.
I almost forgot that no-lynch and no-vote are different
Also for some reason even when you "don't vote without a reason" you jumped from a no-reason vote to another.
I didn't consider no-lynch to be an actual vote, which is prob my bad, but the vote for lefafel is based on reason. I did who spinner says.
Offline
less than convincing logic.
It didn't occur to you that perhaps he felt threatened when they saw they were firstpicked out of nowhere? People tend to panic when in the spotlight, so they try to pass the ball to others, in this case IppE. That being said...
Vote: Aurelianus Augustus
Offline
Apologies for neglecting...
As there is very little to go by currently, I'll vote based on Hades Izanami's less than convincing logic. Maybe they're trying to stir up arguments for their own benefit? Who knows.
Vote: Hades Izanami
He was never known to be a man of logic, so despite voting for me out of silliness, he doesn't seem like he's capable of scheming like a dirty, filthy cyborg and thus you shouldn't base your vote solely around that.
Offline
Lefafel wrote:less than convincing logic.
It didn't occur to you that perhaps he felt threatened when they saw they were firstpicked out of nowhere? People tend to panic when in the spotlight, so they try to pass the ball to others, in this case IppE.
Aurelianus fast response is pretty suspicious
It's perfectly reasonable, even expected, to defend yourself when being threatened, it's not something to label suspicious at all. You calling it suspicious is what's actually suspicious.
Offline
Lefafel wrote:Apologies for neglecting...
As there is very little to go by currently, I'll vote based on Hades Izanami's less than convincing logic. Maybe they're trying to stir up arguments for their own benefit? Who knows.
Vote: Hades Izanami
He was never known to be a man of logic, so despite voting for me out of silliness, he doesn't seem like he's capable of scheming like a dirty, filthy cyborg and thus you shouldn't base your vote solely around that.
So the best case scenario is that he's just an useless friendly, since he cannot be trusted to act logically. Worst case, he's going to kill us all.
I think it's a good enough D1 vote to stick to for now.
Offline
Man would it be funny if I ate my own words and he turned out to be a cyborg just pretending to be daft, but actually planned it out all along.
Offline
Lefafel wrote:less than convincing logic.
It didn't occur to you that perhaps he felt threatened when they saw they were firstpicked out of nowhere? People tend to panic when in the spotlight, so they try to pass the ball to others, in this case IppE. That being said...
Vote: Aurelianus Augustus
I could place you in the spotlight, if you want me to. We seem to know for a fact that there are no suicidal players in the game but you're drawing an awful amount of attention to yourself.
あああああああ
Offline
Hades Izanami wrote:Lefafel wrote:less than convincing logic.
It didn't occur to you that perhaps he felt threatened when they saw they were firstpicked out of nowhere? People tend to panic when in the spotlight, so they try to pass the ball to others, in this case IppE. That being said...
Vote: Aurelianus Augustus
I could place you in the spotlight, if you want me to. We seem to know for a fact that there are no suicidal players in the game but you're drawing an awful amount of attention to yourself.
I don't particularly mind the attention myself, so go ahead.
What I do want you to clarify is this:
We seem to know for a fact that there are no suicidal players in the game
Are you basing this on just the player headcount, or is there something more you've picked up?
Offline
Player alignments were released at the start of the game, no? I would personally have preferred mod to have said "0-1 neutral" or whatever, with other roles also being 0-1 to add ambiguity to such a low player game, but it is what it is. I'm saying we have no jester or other roles which the win condition of getting lynched.
あああああああ
Offline
Sorry, I'll try to remember to quote people more, I have a habit of just posting in quick reply if I am the following poster. It's bad practice in mafia and hasn't been intentional.
あああああああ
Offline
Votes
IppE: 1 (Aurelianus Augustus)
fittan: 1 (zertap)
Lefafel: 1 (abraker)
Hades Izanami: 1 (Lefafel)
abraker: 1 (IppE)
Aurelianus Augustus: 1 (Hades Izanami)
No vote: fittan
bit under 3 days left.
(´・ω・`)
Offline