Tuuba Time: 2026-06-06 12:00:10 | Local Time: 2026-06-06 09:00:10

You are not logged in.

#331 Re: Off Topic » ITT: Pretend we are still writing in osu! OT » 2017-11-26 14:15:47

probably going to be killed by my teachers tomorrow so sorry if I go silent/less active :)

#332 Re: Mafia » Tuuba Mafia 4: The death of Mara [Town & Jester Victory] » 2017-11-26 12:57:13

oh for fuck's sake just end me now

Hika, Mara, please post reads asap
Multtari, was that all of your paragraphs or are you still working on something bigger? what's your read on lefa? any defense re his claims?

Mara wrote:

I'm too lazy to read all the crap in previous pages. tl;dr pls

it's near impossible to provide a satisfactory tldr but basically everyone is a suspect, as per standard d1
we were kinda heading towards a soner lynch for being a really stupid probably-townie, but that's obviously not going to be the case anymore
at least read the last 2 pages or so, that should give you a satisfactory overview of the situation at hand, main suspects/people who nearly hit lynch votes so far have been fittan and me (which is pretty normal, considering we've been the two most active players)

#333 Re: Mafia » Tuuba Mafia 4: The death of Mara [Town & Jester Victory] » 2017-11-26 11:33:51

Lefafel wrote:

He made an off-handed remark about sonar deserving to be voted for his rule breaking, while still holding onto his RV on fittan. Multtari's contribution to the dialogue has been minimal otherwise, and this kind of cheering on of a "useless townie" lynch looks like a classic lowkey mafia play to me.

I'm pretty sure I basically did the same, I honestly can't remember if I dropped my vote on boat or not when I was accusing others. it might be slightly off yes, but I def wouldn't start pointing fingers purely based on that

Hades Izanami wrote:

While y'all are yelling at each other, I noticed that Granger has been the least focused, with that innocent girl game, squeezing as much information as possible. Nice try, but It wasnt enough.

granger basically said she'll be asking for a replacement in OT way before this post, please read everything before pointing fingers. at least she actually bothers asking to be replaced unlike other inactives

Multtari wrote:

Tupsu is trying to antagonize abraker for playing his usual game because ???

Hades pulls a vote on fittan with little to no reasoning given so far

Does tupsu always play this aggressively?

it's my first game as town and first game playing with abraker
I addressed this in my megapost at the start of the page, go read before asking more about either of those
(also can I just point out that while I'm not actively accusing him, his gdoc and post by post scum reads don't necessarily mean he's town, as seen here https://forums.tuuba.moe/viewtopic.php?pid=8074#p8074
nobody has really given *any* solid reasoning for why he can't be scum thus far
fittan, you've stated you believe he's pro-town, can you provide your reasoning? I'd really like to understand what y'all see in him)

#334 Re: Mafia » Tuuba Mafia 4: The death of Mara [Town & Jester Victory] » 2017-11-26 00:16:09

abraker wrote:

One does not simply say, "stop suspecting me or I will go suicidal as townie" and get away with this. In all games I have been, and I am pretty sure the game enet was with you in, they did not simply self declare they will go nuts if they can't be seen as townie. They become like that through hopelessness as they realize proving they are townie becomes a lost cause. If you say you will go nuts, then you are aware enough not to. What you just did is shady as fuck and has a name: a threat.

I was referring to not the suicidal part but the part where he was forced into a corner by mafia, where everything he said just seemed to implicate him more (and I think you may be thinking of a different game or something, since at one point he pretty specifically said 'fuck you, I'm town but I don't want to win, I'm voting to lynch myself so mafia wins')

enet wrote:

Just lynch me D1 and point fingers at the ppl who started bandwagoning.  FUCK YOU TUPSU AND GRANGER. DIE.
I'll hold this grudge all the way through to the next mafia game.

enet wrote:

How come whenever I want to lynch myself this game, it doesn't go my way?
Oh yeah, I remember now, I originally wanted to kill myself for the same reason I'm being voted for now.  Yeah...  people playing the game stupidly...

I am pro-town, I do want to win, trying to get myself lynched would be very counterproductive to both of those things

I'm already in bed so you'll get the rest of my deep insight tomorrow

#335 Re: Off Topic » oblibatory ytuube/webm thread » 2017-11-25 20:56:27

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R5Hy3Sd1OU8
sorry for being an embarassing fan but dinoflask is a pretty good editor

#336 Re: Mafia » Tuuba Mafia 4: The death of Mara [Town & Jester Victory] » 2017-11-25 13:59:42

forgot about that message, all good I guess. sorry

I'm working too now so I'll be unreachable until ~6 hours later at the earliest

#338 Re: Mafia » Tuuba Mafia 4: The death of Mara [Town & Jester Victory] » 2017-11-25 11:32:18

abraker wrote:

W A L L O F T E X T

aaaaaaaAAAAAAAAAAAA
I'm not ready to deal with this this early in the morning

1, I haven't played with you before, I have read a game you were in before, you only cracked out the google doc after game was over that time which was far easier to get through
2, soner has yet to come on and explain themselves, which is part of why I'm heavily advocating for a retard lynch. townie that harms town is worse than townie that questions everything and inevitably implicates themselves in the process. if they came on and actually provided a valid explanation+content/reads, I would be happily willing to drop it as long as they don't continue doing panties on head retarded shit. instead they've been completely silent ever since said PM, which isn't exactly making me like them more.
3, yes, I was in the game where enet went full fucking suicidal and voted for self-lynch just because people were on his ass. mafia did a decent job at making him look like a loonie to the point where the entire game believed he's scum based on his behaviour. you might not have noticed, this is my second game total and first game as townie, I really don't have the perfect poker face y'all seem to be expecting of me. please don't make the enet situation happen again.
4, I don't see the point in posting if it's not to provide additional theories or possible lynch targets, to generate discussion and activity rather than silently allow a full RVS lynch to go through (or worse yet, allow a no-lynch since that literally only helps scum). I'm not setting up anything, I just want to survive the fucking day and not lynch another active player. I don't write out my reasonings for my scumreads in as explicit detail as you do, that's probably why it seems 'aggressive' to you. I will try my best to provide reasonings in the future if it makes you feel better about my non-scumminess.
note how I haven't voted anyone besides boat earlier on, which was very much a RV and withdrawn shortly after since it was not providing any information
5, even if you don't like me, you have to accept the fact that assuming we're all town, mafia is rubbing their hands together in absolute glee as we bite into each other. if you are scum (AND NO, THIS IS NOT ME ACCUSING YOU, IT IS ME PROVIDING A HYPOTHETICAL), you are in perfect position as out of the three active accusers, you're the only one with no votes on you and seem to be having a great time trying to convince people to vote me.

I'm currently leaning townie on you, if on nothing else than your fervor in trying to vote me out. you're being way too loud and insistent on it for it to be a mafia scheme, and if it is it's just stupid enough to seem like an aggressive townie instead. it is still bothering me that your posts so far have all just been pointing fingers at me (and, really, "All you say is suggestive self-defense, which is why it's easy to counter"? it's hard to say anything else when the only stuff you post is accusations at me and vague claims about figuring out other roles)

fittan wrote:

What tupsu was right about is there likely only being two scum and a maximum of one neutral faction, though I would prefer three scum (also, guessing sizes of scum and neutral faction in public is extremely out of character :^) ).

how is it out of character? I've read enough of their games to know how the finns like to set their mafias up. I like having some type of framework to work with, hence why I'm publicly posting that guess (also I don't care enough to set up a google doc just for the sake of game, so you get my unfiltered thoughts here most of the time. also part of why I probably sound aggressive)
do you mean out of character in the sense of meta or what? cause that's not really a rule here as far as I can tell

fittan wrote:

This, partly, makes Granger seem like an enemy of Tuubatown, but not enough to warrant a lynch train. Granger also hasn't had that much to say about the events up until this point, which makes it seem like bandwagoning with tupsu to me, making me want to have either of them boldly claim (not necessarily role claim) that they are part of town and not in allegiance with whom they suspect is scum and want to lynch.

okay, here you go, despite me saying it earlier in this post: I am town, and I have already breadcrumbed my role if you know how to read into posts, so spend some time meditating on that if you'd like. can't do anything about other players being inactive, as much as I'd love to in order to reduce suspicion on me.

fittan wrote:

I'd like to return to this post briefly, your vote was the third, while Granger's the fourth. If you think this carries little significance, you're absolutely correct. However, your reaction to my response does. You may have acted out of paranoia, but you're the only one to have reacted this way (other than Lefafel briefly after you, but without elaboration which makes it seem like another RV). Did you get on my case due to this vote, or only after it?

like I've previously said, I just found it slightly funny/odd that you specifically picked her to rag on despite me posting between you two. I'd still like to know if you just missed my post somehow or what, but no it should not be taken as a strong read whatsoever - especially since we're two pages away from it at this point and you're being the most helpful player around thus far. my post was to spur you into a reaction and gain information based on that, it was never all that serious - your response just stuck out as weird to me in a phase with very little information to work with.

fittan wrote:

Why Lefafel? Another case of accusing someone of voting scum to seem less like a scum pair? You're very stuck on this being the case if I understand this correctly (tell me if I don't).

again, it was odd to me that they put a second vote on a person during RVS, where in my opinion vote checking everyone and seeing their response would be the most reasonable move to gather as much information as possible. that's why I originally voted boat - no one else had yet. like my original vote on you, it should really not be taken as a serious read at this point.
tldr: stop reading into/assuming I still believe my very early scumreads, they were based entirely on RVS behaviour and have not been backed up as we move into more directed votes. my suspicion is on the inactives right now, in particular soner because he has still not provided any explanation or understanding of the situation, but I really can't call it a scumread because as we've established previously, soner is probably just retarded first game town.

also mod offered a fucking image to go with my "you're an autist", so I think I'm good on being warned ))

Lefafel wrote:

This is a very good point, and one that makes me give up my current vote. Someone who is in the mindset of lying or trying to manipulate will very rarely concede to an acusation like this, strongly hinting that fittan was, at least at that point in time, sincere.

I agree with this, but I still feel uncomfortable about the fact that he hasn't even said "I just felt like it" as explanation for voting granger over me, or even going with the conveniently offered up "oh yeah I just missed your post". not necessarily something implicating him at all, but it still feels like an inconsistency in his behaviour to me


Granger please post your take on the situation asap, we need fresh eyes + viewpoints here

#339 Re: Mafia » Tuuba Mafia 4: The death of Mara [Town & Jester Victory] » 2017-11-24 23:34:12

jesus fuck you're being an autist
not saying that in a bad way, but you're putting far too much weight on stupid roleplay type shit being said in very early RVS both by me and others

abraker wrote:

I would rather not vote at all than vote on a potential townie. The worst case scenario in voting a 50/50 is that two townies are dead vs one if not voting. It is not worth trying to get mafia over two townie deaths this early in the game. Scum would want to increase the number of townies dead per day, and they are able to sway votes to their advantage since they know who is mafia.

in this size game, I doubt there is more than 2 mafia + possible one third party, which isn't an issue per se for the time being. this means we are at very low risk of actually losing until night 2 maybe. we can afford to mislynch on D1, and my argument mostly relies on the fact that people who break rules that directly tend to generally be unhelpful later on in the game, townie or not.

I honestly really can't tell if fittan is scummy or just overeager at this point, but it is bothering me that you and fittan - the two players going most aggressive so far - have yet to really suspect each other. abraker, what's your read on fittan right now? your magic docs seems to say you originally suspected him and then turned on me, which based on the docs seems to exclude the possibility of him being scum - why is that the case?

then again, we're probably all town and scum is distancing because of trying to not draw attention to themselves + promote infighting

I'm going to sleep someone take my keys from me

#340 Re: Mafia » Tuuba Mafia 4: The death of Mara [Town & Jester Victory] » 2017-11-24 20:51:57

Granger wrote:

Hmm... Idk what to think of this. Im horrible at D1s, much prefer me some solid evidence.

Abraker: So you're claiming to have a role with a ability that lets you know someone else as townie on d1? This points to Mason but it'd be foolish to claim this this early. Whats up with that? Knowing you id expect better, explain yourself please.

as far as I can tell, he's just saying he thinks he knows someone is definite townie but has no proof for it
that said, it is kinda weird and might be a slip, but I'm thinking it's more being overly sure of d1 reads
or he's mafia and knows most to all townies via process of elimination :') (most since we've no idea about possible third parties yet - it's a small game so I'd expect none, but you never know)

#341 Re: Mafia » Tuuba Mafia 4: The death of Mara [Town & Jester Victory] » 2017-11-24 20:31:04

abraker wrote:

You suspect lefafel for voting fittan for the same reason you suspect fittan. lefafel voted in response to fittan's vote on Granger and you trying into implicate fittan as scum.

as said, those two were extremely hesitant and early reads, mostly there to try and get people to think/share ideas, get some discussion going. really not sure why you think they're pure gospel, but considering your only posts so far have been ragging on me heavily, you're doing a pretty good job at getting me to abandon those and pursue a read on you instead.

abraker wrote:

Looking at fittan's ISO, all he did is run on Granger for rvs between Granger and Multtari. That holds no water.

yet again, and like I've told you three times or something now, it was a very hesitant read based on something silly that I found slightly weird. the initial suspicion was on page fucking two and like five comments in, no shit it'll be based on something very flimsy. at this point I'm only going to vote fittan once it's necessary to save my own ass - he's one of the few people actually thinking along and exhibiting logical sense. I absolutely do not want to lynch him, but I also refuse to be default-lynched for reaching tying votes first

abraker wrote:

No, the finishing blow was when you said that you are ready to lynch Soner for breaking rules with no consideration or further insight and with what sounds a ruthless tone. Fittan proceeded to vote you after that. You are shifting viewpoints here.

as explained only three posts back, and related to my previous point:

tupsu wrote:

imo a d1 info lynch on a basically-confirmed dumb, fairly inactive townie is better than voting someone who's 50/50 on flipping scum (particularly since I'm opposed to voting active players early on, knowing how much of a snooze fest and info black hole forum mafias end up being once one or two actives are dead)

if my choices are a between shot in the complete dark and eliminating someone who will possibly be harmful despite being townie later, I'm going to be advocating for the latter.
tldr please don't force me to roleclaim in fucking d1, that's a great way to help mafia out

here's a thought: maybe soner is just a jester trying to go for the peak confusion play with his 4D chess and betting on us wanting to lynch him for his instability

#342 Re: Mafia » Tuuba Mafia 4: The death of Mara [Town & Jester Victory] » 2017-11-24 16:11:43

Hades Izanami wrote:

Unvote: tupsu
Vote: fittan

interesting move, how come you're voting him? I'm curious about your reasoning

#343 Re: Mafia » Tuuba Mafia 4: The death of Mara [Town & Jester Victory] » 2017-11-24 15:38:56

Lefafel wrote:

Sonar making such a mistake does indeed make him seem useless at best and likely a liability, but would a member of mafia ever do something like that? It would imply that he is intentionally breaking rules just for the sake of creating an illusion of ignorance, which seems a bit extreme at this point. Based on that I am inclined to believe he's harmless for now.

And what comes to the current vote, I believe we are firmly in the realm of random voting still so I'm sticking to my vote for now.

assuming he is in fact mafia, I suppose it might be an attempt to bait out really stupid townies in order to find easy lynch/kill targets? yes, it doesn't add up, but imo a d1 info lynch on a basically-confirmed dumb, fairly inactive townie is better than voting someone who's 50/50 on flipping scum (particularly since I'm opposed to voting active players early on, knowing how much of a snooze fest and info black hole forum mafias end up being once one or two actives are dead). regardless, no one's got their vote on him at the moment so it's kind of a moot discussion at the given time.

unvote, will probably go and reread everything once I'm off the bus and try to make sense of everyone's behaviour

#344 Re: Mafia » Tuuba Mafia 4: The death of Mara [Town & Jester Victory] » 2017-11-24 10:59:38

fittan wrote:

Honestly, I would want to, but it's also something the mafia would want to do really badly if Sonar is a not mafia.

Consider this post distancing from mafia and having an actual reason for voting for once. Tupsu and Multtari are suspicious of conspiring against someone who played like an idiot. Also, I have e-mail notifications of PMs off and they apparently deleted their PM which is ALSO against the rules if we're being pedantic (no post deletion). This is not saying I don't believe comments about this occurring, though I would like the moderator to specify what the warning is for in the future.

Unvote: Granger
Vote: tupsu

the PM part has been clarified by mod, so I'm not touching that.
I don't like idiots in my mafia game, hence why I'm suggesting soner and boat as possible lynch votes. you're really barking up the wrong tree, though. funny how heavily you're locking onto me after I put a hesitant scumread on you, really getting me to think there might be something more to it

#345 Re: Mafia » Tuuba Mafia 4: The death of Mara [Town & Jester Victory] » 2017-11-24 07:21:14

abraker wrote:
tupsu wrote:

but you're reading far too much into very early tinfoiling to get people into thinking and suspecting others/trying to move from rvs to voting on a slightly stronger basis

Some may prefer to stick to rvs for now since they do not have enough info to go on upon. I compile and organize all info, and I came in when enough info was already available, so have plenty to work with and don't need rvs. That said, this action has the implication of you trying to make others stop analyzing you, which is suspicious.

I'm just telling you it was an off-handed comment, read into it as much as you'd like but it really won't lead anywhere. sorry I didn't make it clear enough that it wasn't really a serious accusation.

abraker wrote:
tupsu wrote:

oh yeah I'm also ready to lynch soner on basis of rulebreaking levels of stupid, someone breaking such basic rules deserves the vote

Isn't soner's only comment thus far be

Soner wrote:

Sorry for the wait, I've been busy eating turkey in honor of Indigenous American Genocide Day, but I can't pass up an opportunity to continue that genocidal tradition by killing all Mafia! So, who exactly are we gonna lynch this time?

How is this rulebreaking levels of stupid?

You are getting too many inconsistencies. This is strike II

I thought you'd notice the random PM e-mail in your inbox? they PM'd the entire game asking if anyone happens to be mafia. notice this:

IppE wrote:

Soner has been warned

Stick to the rules kids, read them if you don't know them.

I would post a screenshot, but I'm not sure that's allowed.

Board footer

Powered by Maki (r-e 139/git:b8267ee)

mascot