You are not logged in.
- Topics: Active | Unanswered
^ #1 2016-09-18 20:37:21
signatures are retarded
please make the maximum size for images in signatures smaller, something like 200 or a maximum of 250px height is more than enough
alternately just do not allow trash boat to have any images in his signatures that would also solve the problem
everyone in favour please say I agree
(´･ω･`)
Offline
^ #3 2016-09-18 20:39:43
- EliAslit
- Eurobeat is fantastic
- Registered: 2016-09-18
- Posts: 30
Re: signatures are retarded
Yes
Offline
^ #4 2016-09-18 20:55:55
- Hades Izanami
- Supreme Senpai
- From: Over here
- Registered: 2015-10-19
- Posts: 2,419
Re: signatures are retarded
No
Deal with it
Last edited by Hades Izanami (2016-09-18 20:56:15)
Offline
^ #5 2016-09-18 21:47:50
- silmarilen
- ציצימרילן
- Registered: 2015-12-29
- Posts: 307
Re: signatures are retarded
that's the worst response ever and you should feel bad.
Offline
^ #6 2016-09-18 22:02:32
Re: signatures are retarded
Rather than restricting or painfully measuring signatures you can do some code magic to automatically truncate anything past like 250px and allow users to expand it. (bonus points for when the extra parts of the signature only get loaded untill you actually do that)
But yeah... 
Life is like a box of chocolates.
Offline
^ #7 2016-09-18 23:15:44
Re: signatures are retarded
hey trash have you ever heard about signavatar it used to be quite the thing back when forums were cool and everyone online wasnt a normie you just added on facebook completely ruining the illusion of you just being nothing but an IP-address talking to an IP-address)))))))))))
fittan wrote:that's the worst response ever and you should feel bad.
i mean the limit is set to too high but it just seemed like complaining about there being pictures in sigs in the first place
Rather than restricting or painfully measuring signatures you can do some code magic to automatically truncate anything past like 250px and allow users to expand it. (bonus points for when the extra parts of the signature only get loaded untill you actually do that)
But yeah...
i'd rather not have shitty extra buttons repetitively popping up when scrolling down a page unless i can toggle them myself. i don't recall other forums calling it difficult to just port over the avatar size restriction to signatures
Last edited by fittan (2016-09-18 23:22:42)
あああああああ
Offline
^ #8 2016-09-18 23:27:52
- Hades Izanami
- Supreme Senpai
- From: Over here
- Registered: 2015-10-19
- Posts: 2,419
Re: signatures are retarded
Ugh, the lack of punctuation and commas hurts my eyes. Away, ye scum.
Last edited by Hades Izanami (2016-09-18 23:28:18)
Offline
^ #9 2016-09-18 23:49:19
- UnderminE
- Glasses
- From: İstanbul
- Registered: 2015-11-13
- Posts: 1,090
Re: signatures are retarded
500x200
Offline
^ #10 2016-09-18 23:54:01
Re: signatures are retarded
Rather than restricting or painfully measuring signatures you can do some code magic to automatically truncate anything past like 250px and allow users to expand it. (bonus points for when the extra parts of the signature only get loaded untill you actually do that)
But yeah...
http://mei.tuuba.moe/XR1NEk.webm
aka discuss the optimal minimized and maximized heights while I figure out how many things it's going to break before implementing it.
Offline
^ #11 2016-09-19 00:11:46
Re: signatures are retarded
Awesome. How many px is the avatar space (not just the avatar but the entire thing?) Half of that would make a good maximum for the minimized one i think.
Maximized, until the entire sig shows suppose, but maximal double of the avatar space. (that ought to be more than enough space for nutcases to put everything they'd like and their mothers in there.)
Last edited by Granger (2016-09-19 00:12:12)
Life is like a box of chocolates.
Offline
^ #12 2016-09-19 00:21:14
Offline
^ #13 2016-09-19 00:33:38
^ #14 2016-09-19 00:36:43
- Hades Izanami
- Supreme Senpai
- From: Over here
- Registered: 2015-10-19
- Posts: 2,419
Re: signatures are retarded
Jokes on you, it may not work for mobile users.
Offline
^ #15 2016-09-19 00:37:35
