You are not logged in.
not sure if you've forgotten I'm a female again or you're going on about something unrelated
honestly tb day 1 info lynch would be a decent strategy, but I'd leave that for a situation when we really have 0 other scumreads to follow (so as late in the day as possible)
(´・ω・`)
Offline
Votes
fittan (2) - Multtari, Lefafel
Hades Izanami (1) - tupsu
Multtari (1) - Granger
Granger (1) - fittan
tupsu (1) - Hades Izanami
not sure if you've forgotten I'm a female again or you're going on about something unrelated
Rules of the internet and all that.
Offline
tupsu wrote:not sure if you've forgotten I'm a female again or you're going on about something unrelated
Rules of the internet and all that.
I thought you said you were straight?
(´・ω・`)
Offline
please stop off-topic discussion about pronouns and gay shit
fittan wrote:the first thing granger did was vote someone after a random lynch train had started ?_?
Unvote: Lefafel falafel
Vote: Grangervoting granger for RV, while completely ignoring my RV just before it? are you a scum trying to play down you and granger as a scumpair? or trying to implicate me as your partner in illegal crimes?
it does make sense that mafia would have a gun, but what do I know, apparently I was somehow reincarnated after being killed by gladi
now, see, your vote was just as nonsensical as any of ours, but at the same time you had the best reasoning
あああああああ
Offline
Sorry for the wait, I've been busy eating turkey in honor of Indigenous American Genocide Day, but I can't pass up an opportunity to continue that genocidal tradition by killing all Mafia! So, who exactly are we gonna lynch this time?
Offline
please stop off-topic discussion about pronouns and gay shit
tupsu wrote:fittan wrote:the first thing granger did was vote someone after a random lynch train had started ?_?
Unvote: Lefafel falafel
Vote: Grangervoting granger for RV, while completely ignoring my RV just before it? are you a scum trying to play down you and granger as a scumpair? or trying to implicate me as your partner in illegal crimes?
it does make sense that mafia would have a gun, but what do I know, apparently I was somehow reincarnated after being killed by gladi
now, see, your vote was just as nonsensical as any of ours, but at the same time you had the best reasoning
yeah, I mostly wanted to see if boat flips out at being threatened, which would be sign of a scared newbscum. he didn't, but I'm not dropping my vote for now
my extremely flimsy initial scumread is on either you or lefa, you for the weird granger vote that ignored me (though I suppose that could've been you just missing my post, though you haven't said anything in your defense yet so still sus) and him for vote piling on you during RVS
but we still have at least one completely silent player, so don't read much into it
Sorry for the wait, I've been busy eating turkey in honor of Indigenous American Genocide Day, but I can't pass up an opportunity to continue that genocidal tradition by killing all Mafia! So, who exactly are we gonna lynch this time?
hopefully mafia, but we'll see what happens
(´・ω・`)
Offline
yeah, I mostly wanted to see if boat flips out at being threatened, which would be sign of a scared newbscum. he didn't, but I'm not dropping my vote for now
my extremely flimsy initial scumread is on either you or lefa, you for the weird granger vote that ignored me (though I suppose that could've been you just missing my post, though you haven't said anything in your defense yet so still sus) and him for vote piling on you during RVS
We have little to nothing to go by, I have nothing to defend myself from. I'm just stabbing in the dark.
あああああああ
Offline
Finally caught up and filled in the data. Now let's see,
fittan wrote:the first thing granger did was vote someone after a random lynch train had started ?_?
Unvote: Lefafel falafel
Vote: Grangervoting granger for RV, while completely ignoring my RV just before it? are you a scum trying to play down you and granger as a scumpair? or trying to implicate me as your partner in illegal crimes?
Emphasis on bold part.
Person A (potential scum) implicating that Person B (scum or town) is with them implicates that Person A is scum. Scum would not want others to think they are scum. Therefore, argument is false. Therefore, Person A is not implicating that Person B is scum.
If the person directing the argument is Person B, and if Person B is scum, then such argument use would be to draw suspicion away from Person B and implicate Person A as scum. If Person B is town, then its use would just be to implicate person A as scum.
In short, tupsu is now on my watch list for contradiction and possible set up.
Offline
yeah, I mostly wanted to see if boat flips out at being threatened, which would be sign of a scared newbscum. he didn't, but I'm not dropping my vote for now
my extremely flimsy initial scumread is on either you or lefa, you for the weird granger vote that ignored me (though I suppose that could've been you just missing my post, though you haven't said anything in your defense yet so still sus) and him for vote piling on you during RVS
Why keep vote on Hades and suspect entirely different set of people?
Offline
That being said, Multtari in all honesty has the word excuse to vote someone thus far. Gut feeling.
this was supposed to say worst btw excuse oops
english is hard when all words sound the same
Finally caught up and filled in the data. Now let's see,
tupsu wrote:fittan wrote:the first thing granger did was vote someone after a random lynch train had started ?_?
Unvote: Lefafel falafel
Vote: Grangervoting granger for RV, while completely ignoring my RV just before it? are you a scum trying to play down you and granger as a scumpair? or trying to implicate me as your partner in illegal crimes?
Emphasis on bold part.
Person A (potential scum) implicating that Person B (scum or town) is with them implicates that Person A is scum. Scum would not want others to think they are scum. Therefore, argument is false. Therefore, Person A is not implicating that Person B is scum.
If the person directing the argument is Person B, and if Person B is scum, then such argument use would be to draw suspicion away from Person B and implicate Person A as scum. If Person B is town, then its use would just be to implicate person A as scum.
In short, tupsu is now on my watch list for contradiction and possible set up.
nothing to add except that this is also something smart scum would say, but at the same time you brought up good points about tupsu
あああああああ
Offline
tupsu wrote:yeah, I mostly wanted to see if boat flips out at being threatened, which would be sign of a scared newbscum. he didn't, but I'm not dropping my vote for now
my extremely flimsy initial scumread is on either you or lefa, you for the weird granger vote that ignored me (though I suppose that could've been you just missing my post, though you haven't said anything in your defense yet so still sus) and him for vote piling on you during RVSWhy keep vote on Hades and suspect entirely different set of people?
because it's early d1, all my real scumreads are far too flimsy to follow and I'm the resident boat bully of the forum
your other point is kinda valid I guess, but you're reading far too much into very early tinfoiling to get people into thinking and suspecting others/trying to move from rvs to voting on a slightly stronger basis
can elaborate/further defend myself while I'm not on the bus
oh yeah I'm also ready to lynch soner on basis of rulebreaking levels of stupid, someone breaking such basic rules deserves the vote
(´・ω・`)
Offline
but you're reading far too much into very early tinfoiling to get people into thinking and suspecting others/trying to move from rvs to voting on a slightly stronger basis
Some may prefer to stick to rvs for now since they do not have enough info to go on upon. I compile and organize all info, and I came in when enough info was already available, so have plenty to work with and don't need rvs. That said, this action has the implication of you trying to make others stop analyzing you, which is suspicious.
oh yeah I'm also ready to lynch soner on basis of rulebreaking levels of stupid, someone breaking such basic rules deserves the vote
Isn't soner's only comment thus far be
Sorry for the wait, I've been busy eating turkey in honor of Indigenous American Genocide Day, but I can't pass up an opportunity to continue that genocidal tradition by killing all Mafia! So, who exactly are we gonna lynch this time?
How is this rulebreaking levels of stupid?
You are getting too many inconsistencies. This is strike II
Offline
tupsu wrote:but you're reading far too much into very early tinfoiling to get people into thinking and suspecting others/trying to move from rvs to voting on a slightly stronger basis
Some may prefer to stick to rvs for now since they do not have enough info to go on upon. I compile and organize all info, and I came in when enough info was already available, so have plenty to work with and don't need rvs. That said, this action has the implication of you trying to make others stop analyzing you, which is suspicious.
I'm just telling you it was an off-handed comment, read into it as much as you'd like but it really won't lead anywhere. sorry I didn't make it clear enough that it wasn't really a serious accusation.
tupsu wrote:oh yeah I'm also ready to lynch soner on basis of rulebreaking levels of stupid, someone breaking such basic rules deserves the vote
Isn't soner's only comment thus far be
Soner wrote:Sorry for the wait, I've been busy eating turkey in honor of Indigenous American Genocide Day, but I can't pass up an opportunity to continue that genocidal tradition by killing all Mafia! So, who exactly are we gonna lynch this time?
How is this rulebreaking levels of stupid?
You are getting too many inconsistencies. This is strike II
I thought you'd notice the random PM e-mail in your inbox? they PM'd the entire game asking if anyone happens to be mafia. notice this:
Soner has been warned
Stick to the rules kids, read them if you don't know them.
I would post a screenshot, but I'm not sure that's allowed.
(´・ω・`)
Offline