Tuuba Time: 2024-02-23 04:31:34 | Local Time: 2024-02-23 02:31:34

You are not logged in.

#1 Re: Other media » Tuuba Gaming » 2017-06-20 14:33:18

Won't have a lot of time (if any at all) this July, tbh, but in case I've got some, I'd play:

L4D2
UT2k4 (even though I'll suck balls at it)
Broken piece o'shit drill 2
100% Salty Juice (you'll have a chance to see a Russian being on a verge of killing himself, that's quite a show, tellin' ya)
And also NEOTOKYO and Fistful of Frags

Would appreciate if there would be an announcement a week prior to when the event takes place, so I could install needed game(s) and see if I can even play at all.

#2 Re: Mafia » Tuuba Mafia 3: The Return of Mafia [TOWN VICTORY] » 2016-09-14 16:13:03

Shit, forgot the reason for Enet. He might've used the reverse psychology trick on D1, plus that vote against Sync just because he mislynched LunarStorm. I can see why he was almost the only candidate for lynching at the end of D2, because there was no progress anyway, but wanting to kill only him for that reason and not thinking of other candidates at all, I don't even know.

#3 Re: Mafia » Tuuba Mafia 3: The Return of Mafia [TOWN VICTORY] » 2016-09-14 16:00:55

Hopefully, I don't forget to check on the game tomorrow

#4 Re: Mafia » Tuuba Mafia 3: The Return of Mafia [TOWN VICTORY] » 2016-09-14 16:00:12

Welp, fuck, looks like I've missed all the fun. I'm guilty as charged for completely forgetting about the game due to real fucking mess IRL.

Anyway, from what I've read and remember (I'd go insane if I read all the posts again and try to analyze them for 2 hours) one thing is certain – we mislynch, we lose, so I'm gonna claim myself to be the doctor. And I still can only speculate about who's the mafia, although I do believe that Gladi is Vig and not an SK (but if he is, I don't even know, then). My bets are on Enet + Granger or Enet + IppE. Granger and IppE are on my list because both claim to be the tracker, plus IppE being neutral most of the time, especially during D1 and Granger being fishy with this:

GladiOol wrote:

Granger, why did you not act after tracking me N1? You knew I did something to Multtari that resulted in him dying. Yet, you didn't even try to approach me or anything of the sort. In fact, you voted Sync before I even revealed that I am the vigi.

There's also a tiny chance that Hika is a mafia, but nobody refuted her claim and there's pretty much 0% chance that there's only 1 mason in the game from what I understand. Though, as someone said, "everything is possible in mafia game".

#5 Re: Off Topic » ITT: Pretend we are still writing in osu! OT » 2016-09-07 15:02:28

So, I got this energetic drink today and I feel absolutely no difference so far. It says it has 30 mg of caffeine and 240 mg of taurine per 100 ml and I wonder if that's a lot or not.

Hidden text

energetic

Btw, tastes surprisingly good, I guess mostly because I expected it to be total piss.

#6 Re: Forum games » Ask the next person anything » 2016-09-06 19:01:05

Nighttime, of course.

Would you rather edit your genes or install augments and implants?

#7 Re: Mafia » Tuuba Mafia 3: The Return of Mafia [TOWN VICTORY] » 2016-09-06 18:22:14

tupsu wrote:
FirstTroph wrote:
enet wrote:

FirstTroph?  Granger?  Will anyone refute that Mason claim?  If no one is then it's safe to assume it's true.

I don't see how one can claim to be a mason without their partner confirming that both of them are masons and why would anyone believe that. If there actually were only 2 masons which is very likely, then claiming being a mason equals claiming being just a townie at this point. Or is it some meta I simply don't get?

being confirmed mason would mean you're confirmed townie - which is pretty good at this point in game. hika could try to claim mason without really being mason, in which case you or granger would have to be the real mason and could call her out on her bluff.
it could also be a red herring mason with no second mason, though, in which case hika is currently pulling a masterful scumbluff and hoping it flies (granger doesn't prove her wrong), considering neither multtari (the other mason) or the cop can confirm it anymore. basically I'm kinda willing to believe that she is mason, but it's pretty much impossible to know 100% anymore

I understand that claiming to be the other mason is an advantage, but if there are 1 or 2 masons in total, of which I'm pretty sure, then wouldn't it make this claim become worthless since everybody can just claim to be one and there would be absolutley no way to confirm it?

Also,

tupsu wrote:
Hika wrote:

I just meant what FT said
but I guess I'm seeing too hard into it
And I'm assuming no plurality lynch either huh

he's an idiot first timer who has had issues with basic logic before, it's honestly not much of a surprise

r00d but kinda true

#8 Re: Mafia » Tuuba Mafia 3: The Return of Mafia [TOWN VICTORY] » 2016-09-06 14:35:27

IppE wrote:

And then you're voting one of the few people who are actually digging trough the shit and getting us information?

You're either kidding or we have completely different definitions of "getting information". We've got no info that we can at least somewhat confirm to be true whatsoever.

enet wrote:

FirstTroph?  Granger?  Will anyone refute that Mason claim?  If no one is then it's safe to assume it's true.

I don't see how one can claim to be a mason without their partner confirming that both of them are masons and why would anyone believe that. If there actually were only 2 masons which is very likely, then claiming being a mason equals claiming being just a townie at this point. Or is it some meta I simply don't get?

#10 Re: Mafia » Tuuba Mafia 3: The Return of Mafia [TOWN VICTORY] » 2016-09-03 17:38:46

I still completely fail to understand how Sync's reasons to vote against Lunar were any solider than any other reasons against any other player, but to hell with that beaten horse anyway. I agree with Gladi since it's kinda obvious that Lunar was an appealing target because they didn't even have to say the reason(s) why they vote against Lunar - simply say that Sync convinced you. Literally three votes were put with this reason.

Also, Gladi, uncovering your role to everyone wasn't the best idea, but letting us choose who you kill at night is even worse, especially if there's a roleblocker on mafia's side (from what I understand roleblocker's faction is decided by the mod, correct me if I'm wrong). Even if you actually kill mafia somehow, they'll know that you're relatively safe for them and they'll go for the others, thus increasing the chance of them killing someone with a powerrole. Assuming the worst, i.e that there are three mafias and we don't lynch/kill any and there's at least one powerrole left, they'll have ≥50% chance of killing them. Even if we get rid of one of them, we'll still be in a tough situation with them having 33% to do it.

Fuck, I got carried away again there with math and I'm not sure that I've made any fucking sense, but my point was supposed to be that we shouldn't discuss who to kill at night via you, Gladi. You gotta make your own decision again, at least our chances of winning will somewhat increase like this.

#12 Re: Forum games » Game: Thread Necromancy » 2016-09-02 04:18:28

Those things seem about to explode

#13 Re: Mafia » Tuuba Mafia 3: The Return of Mafia [TOWN VICTORY] » 2016-08-31 20:13:23

FirstTroph wrote:

Oh, and you where'd you get that he was killed by SK and not by mafia? Or is the description of the murders supposed to be a hint?

enet wrote:

That is considering he was the one to be killed by SK.

Oops, misread a bit.

#14 Re: Mafia » Tuuba Mafia 3: The Return of Mafia [TOWN VICTORY] » 2016-08-31 19:48:03

enet wrote:
FirstTroph wrote:

Care to explain why you think I'm a SK as well?

Simply because of the fact that multtari was the only one to keep his vote on you and you thought that he was 'scummy'.  That is considering he was the one to be killed by SK.

I thought he was scummy? You must be confusing me with someone, because this:

FirstTroph wrote:
Multtari wrote:

Rising suspicions on yourself is pretty bad way to roleplay. Anyway if FirstTroph is a jester he'd be more blatant right off the bat or wait to get lynched later.

Making purposeful mistake and throwing blame on person that points the finger first at you to get him lynched isn't out of question here.

Vote: FirstTroph Above is not my reasoning for this, someone must be lynched.

Now lets see what happens next

You make me sound like some sort of a smart guy. I guess I'll take as a compliment. Which will cost me my life, but still feels nice.

was the only time I ever referred to Multtari, unless I missed some other post of mine, but I'm pretty sure that was it. Nobody actually got suspicious of him, from what I can see.
Oh, and you where'd you get that he was killed by SK and not by mafia? Or is the description of the murders supposed to be a hint?

IppE wrote:
FirstTroph wrote:
IppE wrote:

(for the possibility that Multtari was covering up for the Masonry by voting him)

Erm, it might be my autism, but I genuinely don't understand what you meant by that sentence, especially what Multtari tried to cover up for the Masonry.

Basically it's the same maneuver where a mafia votes another mafia early in the game to cover up in case either party is later confirmed a mafia, since why would a sane mafia member vote another mafia member.

That doesn't really make any sense, though since it'd be way too risky for him to vote against me because I was #2 suspect after Enet. Plus, even if we are both Masons, then why would you suspect me? I mean, aren't they supposed to be pro-town?

Board footer

Powered by Maki (r-e 139/git:b8267ee)

mascot